Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 SW2D 97 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Crane v. State (1990), Perry v. State (1986)

28 state decisions

14019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Lewis · Ex Parte March · Jones v. State · Taylor v. State · 156 Tex. Crim. 377 - Ex Parte Collier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was no objection to any of this testimony and no reason shown for not making a timely objection. There was no request for a hearing to determine if the identification was tainted. Under such record nothing is presented for review. Montoya v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 464 S.W.2d 853 . Timely objections to identification should be made at the first opportunity. Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 207 , and cases therein cited. See also Garcia v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 784 , and Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 413 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Garza v. State
  2. “1. The cause number of the prior conviction; 2. The correct name of the court in which the prior conviction occurred; 3. The date of the prior conviction; and 4. The term of years assessed in the prior case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ex Parte San Migel

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.