Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

488 S.W.3d 144

State v. Hudson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2016

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2016-02-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-02-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2Ryan Hudson appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of robbery, kidnapping, burglary, and armed criminal action. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/488/sw3d/144 · .json · Public domain