Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 488 U.S. 75 - Penson v. Ohio

Penson v. Ohio’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14,933
cited by 14,933 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
43
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

905 federal appellate · 39 district · 1,567 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14,933 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Neitzke v. Williams (1989), Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega (2000)

905 federal appellate · 39 district · 1,567 state decisions — followed in 43 states

7.0k019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright

Cited together with Anders v. California · Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Evitts v. Lucey · Chapman v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14,933 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ctual or constructive denial of the assistance of counsel altogether,”
    70 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the court — not counsel — then proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.... [I]f it finds any of the legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous), it must, prior to decision, afford [appellant] the assistance of counsel to argue the appeal.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.