Carlucci v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc. (1991), Swan v. Clinton (1996)
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedDoe v. Weinberger (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger · Department of the Navy v. Egan · Morrison v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We thus agree with the conclusion of the Merit Systems Protection Board in a similar case that "section 7532 is not the exclusive basis for removals based upon security clearance revocations,” Egan v. Department of the Navy, 28 M.S.P.R. 509 , 521 (1985), and with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that "[t]here is nothing in the text of section 7532 or in its legislative history to suggest that its procedures were intended to preempt section 7513 procedures whenever the removal could be taken under section 7532. The language of section 7532 is permissive.” Egan v. Department of the Navy, 802 F.2d 1563 , 1568 (Fed.Cir.1986), rev’d, 484 U.S. 518 , 108 S.Ct. 818 , 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“are not the exclusive means to remove NSA employees for national security reasons, but instead contemplate alternative recourse to NSA's ordinary removal mechanisms pursuant to the 1959 NSA Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Cheney“shall, when appropriate, take action pursuant to other provisions of law, as applicable, to terminate the employment of a civilian officer or employee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Cheney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.