Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 F.2d 1353 - United States v. Walker

United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

489 F.2d 1353 · 1973

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
July 1999
most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202 · 50 U.S.C. § 3809 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on United States v. Bass · Rewis v. United States · Perez v. United States · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · United States v. Fruehauf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Government can obviously meet its burden in a variety of ways. We note only some of these. For example, a person ‘possesses ... in commerce or affecting commerce’ if at the time of the offense the gun was moving interstate or on an interstate facility, or if the possession affects commerce. Significantly broader in reach, however, is the offense of ‘receiv[ing] ... in commerce or affecting commerce,’ for we conclude that the Government meets its burden here if it demonstrates that the firearm received has previously traveled in interstate commerce.” 404 U.S. at 350 , 92 S.Ct. at 524 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under that statutory scheme, judicial review of the classification process is normally unavailable until the registrant is required to defend a criminal charge. In such cases, determination of guilt or innocence typically turns on an analysis of the defendant’s Selective Service file, (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““If two or more persons conspire . . . to commit any offense against the United States, . . . and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.