Palmer v. Wainwright

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

March 6, 1974.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1974-03-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1974

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kimbrough v. Beto · Home Telephone Company v. Darley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1974-03-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Chester Allen Palmer, pro se.

Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before COLEMAN, DYER and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The order of the District Court in this cause, dismissing the Petitioner's fourth petition for the writ of habeas corpus for failure to exhaust state remedies is

Affirmed.1

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981