Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Westchester Fire Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
489 F.3d 580 · 2007
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2021
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marks v. United States · Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. · Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna · Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle · PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The issue before us is who should make the determination as to whether to consolidate the three grievances into a single arbitration: the arbitrator or a federal court. Since each of the three grievances is itself concededly arbitrable, we think the answer is clear. * * * this is a procedural matter for the arbitrator.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In this case, the parties agree that they agreed to arbitrate the matter -- the question is merely whether they agreed to individualized or consolidated proceedings as a matter of procedure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he question of whether an arbitration agreement forbids consolidated arbitration is a procedural one, which the arbitrator should resolve.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.