United States v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
489 F.3d 647 · 2007
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Harris (2009), United States v. Hale (2012)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Zafiro v. United States · Henderson v. United States · United States v. Bermea · United States v. Bieganowski · United States v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[§ 3161(h)(1)(F)] excludes the time needed for a 'prompt disposition’ of the motion, which, under [§ 3161 (h)(1)(J)], may be no more than thirty days from the date the motion is taken under advisement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.