Van Patten v. Endicott’s Empirical Analysis
489 F.3d 827 · 2007
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Cronic · Carey v. Musladin · Wallace v. Kato · Stewart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections · Van Patten v. Deppisch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A state-court decision that correctly identifies the governing legal rule but applies it unreasonably to the facts of a particular prisoner’s case certainly would qualify as a decision “involving] an unreasonable application of ... clearly established Federal law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Smith v. Patrick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.