489 F. Supp. 471 - Fashing v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Monroe v. Pape · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Steffel v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o reciprocal prohibition . . . is placed upon a legislator seeking to run for mayor or judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clements v. Fashing“holding a lucrative office under the United States, or [Texas], or any foreign government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clements v. Fashing“classifications that are invidiously discriminatory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clements v. Fashing
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.