Linville v. Barrows’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Hall v. Bellmon · Penteco Corporation Limited Partnership--1985a v. Union Gas System Inc · Morris v. City of Hobart · 36 F. Supp. 2d 922 - Yue Yu v. Brown · 367 F. Supp. 2d 508 - Saleh v. Ridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The status of an alien who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States or the status of any other alien having an approved petition for classification as a VAWA self-petitioner may be adjusted by the Attorney General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if (1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment, (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and (3) an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“applicant shall be notified of the decision of the director”) (emphasis added); § 245.6 (requiring that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.