Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 NE2D 43 - Stark v. State

Stark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Hammons v. State (1986), Kindred v. State (1988)

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

1801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. State · Brandon v. State · Carson v. State · Bergner v. State · Torres v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Crawford testified that the automatic camera is activated when a bank customer inserts the card into the teller machine and that while in a completed transaction there would be a total of three photographs taken, there was only one photograph of appellant because the teller machine would not complete his attempted withdrawal due to the improper code number. He pointed out that the date, the time of the transaction and the number of the transaction were imprinted on the film and that the transaction number on the photograph of appellant corresponded exactly to the transaction number on the teller machine audit tape. Crawford also testified that the photographs were taken by the automatic camera at the Schererville branch, based on his identification of the branch code number on the film and of the area behind the persons depicted." Stark, supra, 489 N.E.2d at 47 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[ilf an injury to any other person arises as a consequence of the conduct of the accused in committing a robbery, the offense is properly regarded as a class A felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[uJnder the applicable statute, robbery is a Class A felony if it results in bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.