Fabio v. Bellomo’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2013
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb · Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics · Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin · Schmit v. Esser · Donna Walstad and Lawrence Walstad v. University of Minnesota Hospitals and C. Walton Lillehei, Donna Walstad and Lawrence Walstad v. Charles A. Murray, M.D., Carlos Ibarra, M.D., and Russell Stasiuk, M.D.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he papers filed with the trial court, the exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings, if any.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“will strike documents included in a party's brief that are not part of the appellate record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.