State v. Beilke’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2023
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Clausen · First National Bank of Belfield v. Burich · State v. Hersch · Schumacher v. Schumacher · Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Additional powers of peace officers. Peace officers employed by a law enforcement agency within the state have the power of a peace officer in the following circumstances: * * * * * * “3. When responding to requests from other law enforcement agencies or officers for aid and assistance. For the purposes of this subsection, such a request from a law enforcement agency or officer means only a request for assistance as to a particular and singular violation or suspicion of violation of law, and does not constitute a continuous request for assistance outside the purview of the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agency by which a peace officer is employed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“under N.D.C.C. § 11-15-02 to act when regular deputies are unavailable or understaffed, noting a sheriff may not always be able to provide adequate law enforcement services in large and sparsely populated rural counties without the aid of municipal police officers. This Court has not addressed whether a special deputy is exempt from licensing requirements under N.D.C.C. § 12-63-03, and we need not address that issue in this case. [¶ 15] The State agrees Keller does not serve as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ngale“The sheriff may appoint and qualify special deputies in such numbers as are required by the conditions. Each special deputy shall receive compensation for services rendered and the same mileage allowance as regular deputies, which must be paid by the county within the limits of funds budgeted for such purpose. The sheriff shall have the sole power of appointing special deputies and may remove them at pleasure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ngale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.