¶1(specially concurring):
¶2I concur, but add that the prosecutor should have restrained himself from mak*520ing the improper remarks about the Public Defender. “Being provoked” is not sufficient excuse for such remarks.
489 P.2d 516
Byrd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 1, 1971
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1971-09-01
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1987
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1971-09-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →