Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 Pa. 547 - Commonwealth v. Mumma

Commonwealth v. Mumma’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com. (1986), Commonwealth v. Stanley (1982)

54 state decisions

4401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Kichline · Commonwealth v. Rowe · Commonwealth v. Chermansky · Commonwealth v. Lee · 227 Pa. Super. 355 - Commonwealth v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our Supreme Court has explained: The Commonwealth need not prove that the minor’s morals were actually corrupted. Rather, a conviction for corrupting morals will be upheld where the conduct of the defendant tends to corrupt the minor’s morals. The statute speaks to conduct toward a child in an unlimited variety of ways which tends to produce or to encourage or to continue conduct of the child which would amount to delinquent conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.