Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 SO2D 1050 - State v. Diggs

State v. Diggs’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · United States v. Fioravanti · United States v. Thomas · 315 So. 2d 639 - State v. Nicholson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . [i]t is your duty to decide this case if you can conscientiously. . . . If much the larger number of the jurors are of the opinion — are of one opinion, a dissenting juror should consider whether his or her opinion is reasonable in view of the fact that his or her opinion made no impression upon the minds of equally honest and equally intelligent people. Again, I instruct you that it is your duty to decide this case — in other words, reach a verdict — but only if you can conscientiously do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.