Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

489 So. 2d 1239

489 So.2d 1239

11 Fla.L.Weekly 1359

Wollman v. Levy

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-06-17

Relies on 437 So. 2d 768 - Pruitt v. Brock · 461 So. 2d 93 - David v. Sun Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n · Dade County v. Snyder, Et Ux.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-06-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2016

5 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the final summary judgment of foreclosure, see David v. Sun Federal Savings & Loan Association, 461 So.2d 93 (Fla.1984), but vacate the foreclosure sale of the property. Once a timely motion for rehearing is made, the operation of the judgment is suspended until the motion is disposed of. United American Ins. Co. v. Oak, 123 Fla. 159, 170, 166 So. 547, 551 (1936); see Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756, 184 So. 489 (1938); Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768, 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Appellants timely moved for a rehearing; therefore, the sale of the property should not have been carried out until the motion had been acted upon.

¶2Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

/489/so2d/1239 · .json · Public domain