Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 So. 2d 594 - Willmore v. Willmore

489 So. 2d 594 - Willmore v. Willmore’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 109 - Isham v. Isham · Mack v. Mack · 45 Ala. App. 461 - Cooley v. Cooley · Wilson v. Wilson · 51 Ala. App. 295 - Campbell v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Since the trial court heard the testimony and observed the demeanor of the witnesses in this case, its findings are presumed correct and will not be overturned on appeal without a showing of an abuse of discretion. Skipper v. Skipper , 380 So.2d 921 (Ala.Civ.App. 1980). The division of property and award of alimony are matters within the discretion of the trial court. Evans v. Evans , 434 So.2d 254 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982), cert. quashed , 434 So.2d 257 (1983). In making a division of property or award of alimony, the trial court should consider the following factors: source of the property, future prospects of the parties, their ages, health, station in life, length of marriage of the parties, and, in appropriate cases, the conduct of the parties with respect to the cause of divorce. Mack v. Mack , 389 So.2d 1156 (Ala.Civ.App. 1980)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.