489 So. 2d 63 - Acosta v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gissendanner v. State · 283 So. 2d 857 - Troupe v. Rowe · 483 So. 2d 420 - State v. Johnson · Brown v. State · 439 So. 2d 998 - Cherry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“WHERE A DEFENDANT FAILS TO PERFORM A CONDITION OF THIS PLEA BARGAIN, MAY A TRIAL COURT, AFTER SENTENCE HAS BEEN RENDERED AND THE DEFENDANT HAS BEGUN SERVING THAT SENTENCE, VACATE THE DEFENDANT'S PLEA AND INCREASE HIS SENTENCE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.