Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

489 So. 2d 726

489 So.2d 726

11 Fla.L.Weekly 268

Florida Bar v. Ollinger

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1986

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1986-06-12

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1068 - Florida Bar v. Ollinger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-06-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2010

6 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is a disciplinary action brought by the Florida Bar against George E. Ollinger, a member of the Florida Bar. This action arose from an audit of Ollinger’s trust account conducted after the close of a previous disciplinary proceeding.* Pursuant to the results of that audit, the referee recommends that Ollinger be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 2-106(A) (charging excessive fees), 2-106(E) (failure to prepare, execute, and retain closing statements), 3-104(C) (insufficient supervision of nonlawyer personnel), 3-104(D) (improper delegation of work to nonlawyer), and 9-102(B)(4) (failure to promptly pay to client funds to which he is entitled), as well as article XI, rule 11.02(4) (misapplication of funds held for a specific purpose) of the integration rule and certain bylaws thereunder as specified in the referee’s report. Neither party takes exception to the referee’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we adopt the referee’s report and impose the following disciplinary actions: (1) suspension from the practice of law in Florida for sixty (60) days with automatic reinstatement at the end of said suspension; (2) probation for a period of three (3) years during which time Ollinger will retain, at his own expense, the services of a certified public accountant who will review Ollinger’s trust account, contingency fee files, closing statements, and disbursements as detailed in the referee’s report and who shall submit monthly statements to the Florida Bar; and (3) restitution to certain clients in the amounts specified in the referee’s report. Judgment for costs in the amount of $4,087.82 is hereby entered against Ollinger, for which sum let execution issue. So that Ollinger can make arrangements to protect his clients’ interests, this suspension will be effective thirty days from the date of filing this opinion.

¶2It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and McDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

¶3See Florida Bar v. Ollinger, 478 So.2d 1068 (Fla.1985) (public reprimand for violations of disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(1) and 3-104(C), (D) of the Code of Professional Responsibility).

/489/so2d/726 · .json · Public domain