Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 SW2D 106 - Caraway v. State

Caraway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1981
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Baity v. State · McCandless v. State · David v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant also complains that the court erred in charging the jury under Art. 42, V.A.P.C. He claims that the indictment alleged only murder with malice aforethought, not an accidental killing committed while preparing for or executing a felony, and that therefore the indictment failed to inform him as to the accusation he needed to meet. “This Court has held that the State need not plead its evidence in the indictment. Silva v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 223 , 15 S. W.2d 1046 (1929); Jones v. State, 89 Tex.Cr.R. 355 , 231 S.W. 122 (1921).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.