Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 S.W.2d 225 - State v. Summers

State v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2008

19 state decisions

1001972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on E_ M_ R v. G_ E_ R · Valley Spring Hog Ranch Co. v. Plagmann · Belmont v. Gentry · State v. Damm · Rasco v. Rasco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Our search of the law has caused us to conclude that we must take judicial recognition that although serological blood tests to determine type or group cannot indicate that a particular person is the father of a child, they can be used to establish that a particular person is not the father. These tests when properly performed and interpreted, are recognized to be accurate and the results are admissible to establish non-paternity." Id. at 229 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Judicial disregard of blood test exclusions is no doubt due to a misconception of the true nature of the exclusion, which is a demonstrable and scientific fact of life. It is neither controversial nor in the field of expert testimony. The pathologist whose report excludes paternity is not giving `opinion' evidence. He is testifying to ... a fact of life and Nature."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the reliability of blood tests properly given to prove non parentage in certain cases of blood groupings has become unquestioned in the scientific and medical world.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.