Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 489 SW2D 64 - Recor v. State

Recor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2009

11 state decisions

601972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Barnes v. Henderson · Reed v. Henderson · Arthur v. State · 1 Tenn. Crim. App. 525 - Trolinger v. Russell · 4 Tenn. Crim. App. 425 - Recor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Obviously, without regard to such obvious questions as waiver, there can be no due process violation in the conviction process by what may have happened upon a prior post-conviction proceeding. Happenings upon post-conviction proceedings cannot render the initial judgment of conviction constitutionally void or voidable, which is the threshold predicate for such relief. T.C.A. § 40-3805. Unless the conviction or sentence is void or voidable upon constitutional grounds there can be no post-conviction relief.” (Emphasis in original text).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Ground 3 complains that an illegally obtained confession was used against him. On the assumed premise that his guilty plea was understanding^ and voluntarily entered, this allegation states no possible basis for relief, because the question was thereby waived. Reed v. Henderson, (6th Cir. 1967), 385 F.2d 995 ; Trolinger v. Russell, 1 Tenn.Cr.App. 525, 446 S.W.2d 538 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(b)(1) A ground for relief is “waived” if the petitioner knowingly and understandingly failed to present it for determination in any proceeding before a court'of competent jurisdiction in which the ground could have been presented. (2) There is a rebuttable presumption that a ground for relief not raised in any such proceeding which was held was waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.