Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Ala. App. 381 - Hall v. State

49 Ala. App. 381 - Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1990

12 state decisions

80197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Agnew v. United States · Cohen v. United States · Mann v. United States · Knight v. State · United States v. Barash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The jury may mistakenly believe that it is permissible to infer specific knowledge or intent solely from the doing of a particular act, without regard to the totality of circumstances; or that the occurrence of the particular acts shifts the burden of proof of knowledge or intent from the prosecution to the defense; or that the question is whether a reasonable man in similar circumstances would have had the requisite knowledge or intent, rather than whether the accused actually had it.” Hall at 385, 272 So.2d 590 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 460 So. 2d 334 - Salmon v. State · 555 So. 2d 1147 - Cheriogotis v. State
  2. “"We, therefore, are of the opinion that the trial court was in error in charging the jury that the law presumes a person intends to do that which he does where the subjective intent of the defendant determines whether a crime has been committed at all and, if so, the character of the crime."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 364 So. 2d 424 - Snipes v. State · 460 So. 2d 334 - Salmon v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.