Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Ala. App. 654 - Daniels v. State

49 Ala. App. 654 - Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably Radke v. State (1974), 366 So. 2d 740 - Temple v. State (1978)

84 state decisions

5001973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 Ala. App. 722 - Parks v. State · Clenney v. State · 46 Ala. App. 36 - Rueffert v. State · 40 Ala. App. 129 - Mabry v. State · 39 Ala. App. 182 - Beasley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a prosecution for unlawful possession of narcotics it is not necessary to prove manucaption but constructive possession may be shown, and where such possession is relied upon the State must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knew of the presence of the prohibited substance. Rueffert v. State , 46 Ala. App. 36 , 237 So.2d 520 ; Spruce v. State , 43 Ala. App. 487 , 192 So.2d 747 . See cases in 16 Alabama Digest, Poisons, Keynote 9. "Such guilty knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence and guilt does not necessarily depend upon ownership. Parks v. State , 46 Ala. App. 722 , 248 So.2d 761 .”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Counsel with knowledge of a disqualification of a juror may not remain silent and gamble on a favorable verdict and if unfavorable, raise the matter in a motion for new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.