Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 ARKAPP 32 - Bradford v. Bradford

Bradford v. Bradford’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simpson v. State · Lee v. McNeil · 34 Ark. App. 247 - Bradford v. Bradford · Walker v. State · Nation v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject matter jurisdiction, however, is determined from the pleadings, and once a proper charge is filed in circuit court, that court may exercise jurisdiction over that subject matter. . . . Moreover, jurisdiction is granted to a particular position, that is, to a particular court, and not to the person who fills it.. .. Here, the [circuit court] clearly had jurisdiction over the two rape charges and the issue raised by Simpson concerns the authority of the individual who filled that position. As was the case in Nation [v. State, 283 Ark. 250 , 674 S.W.2d 939 (1984)], that issue relates to the authority of the sitting judge and not to the jurisdiction of the circuit court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.