Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 BR 56 - In Re Yanks

In Re Yanks’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
June 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Woburn Associates v. Kahn (1992), Grady v. Ah Robins Company Incorporated (1988)

4 federal appellate ·

1301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 11 U.S.C. § 509 · 11 U.S.C. § 726

Relies on Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green · Bank of Marin v. England · Ohio v. Kovacs · Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To permit a claim to be discharged when creditors file a suit against a third party before a petition is filed and to prevent a claim from being discharged if those same creditors filed the same suit against the same third party after a petition is filed is simply inequitable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.