Vasquez v. Alameda’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 34 Cal. 3d 49 - Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1983), 3 Cal. 3d 756 - Haft v. Lone Palm Hotel (1970)
2 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · Glanzer v. . Shepard · 33 Cal. 2d 80 - Summers v. Tice · Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co. · 24 Cal. 2d 133 - Oettinger v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the first actor foresaw, or by exercising ordinary care would have seen, that a second actor probably would conduct himself as the second actor actually did,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.