49 Cal. 3d 63 - People v. Markham’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
155 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 83 - People v. Crittenden (1994), 53 Cal. 3d 152 - People v. Morris (1991)
155 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Harris v. New York · Lego v. Twomey · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as provided by statute hereafter enacted by a two-thirds vote of the membership in each house of the Legislature, relevant evidence shall not be excluded in any criminal proceeding, including pretrial and post conviction motions and hearings, ... whether heard in juvenile or adult court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as a judicially declared rule of criminal procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.