49 Cal. 4th 613 - People v. Herrera’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2022
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1783
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Chambers v. Mississippi · Barber v. Page · Mattox v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What constitutes due diligence to secure the presence of a witness depends upon the facts of the individual case. [Citation.] The term is incapable of a mechanical definition. It has been said that the word 'diligence' connotes persevering application, untiring efforts in good earnest, efforts of a substantial character. [Citation.] The totality of efforts of the proponent to achieve presence of the witness must be considered by the court. Prior decisions have taken into consideration not only the character of the proponent's affirmative efforts but such matters as whether he reasonably believed prior to trial that the witness would appear willingly ..., whether the search was timely begun, and whether the witness would have been produced if reasonable diligence had been exercised [citation].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Miles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.