Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Cal. App. 597 - People v. Malley

49 Cal. App. 597 - People v. Malley’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
September 1966
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1966

21 state decisions

6019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schenck v. United States · Abrams v. United States · Burton v. United States · Pierce v. United States · People v. Cronin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Legislature has power to1 repress whatever it deems hurtful to the general good, the only limitations being those prescribed in the Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.