Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 CALAPP2D 702 - Jones v. Heinrich

Jones v. Heinrich’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 1975
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1975

15 state decisions

1101942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co. · 50 Cal. App. 556 - Howard v. Worthington · 109 Cal. App. 703 - Gootar v. Levin · 123 Cal. App. 446 - Stealey v. Chessum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who, without negligence on his part, is suddenly and unexpectedly confronted with peril arising from either the actual presence of, or the appearance of, imminent danger to himself or to others, is not expected nor required to use the same judgment and prudence that is required of him in the exercise of ordinary care in calmer and more deliberate moments. His duty is to exercise only the care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise in the same situation. If at that moment he does what appears to him to be the best thing to do, and if his choice and manner of action are the same as might have been followed by any ordinarily prudent person under the same conditions, he does all the law requires of him, although in the light of afterevents, it should appear that a different course would have been better and safer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.