Constantine v. Schneider’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Kelley v. Tomas (2001), Tevolini v. Tevolini (2001)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gurliacci v. Mayer · Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National Bank · Metropolitan District v. Housing Authority · Connecticut National Bank v. Voog · Saphir v. Neustadt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is proper to amplify or expand what has already been alleged in support of a cause of action, provided the identity of the cause of action remains substantially the same, but where an entirely CT Page 10274 new and different factual situation is presented, a new and different cause of action is stated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The essential tests are whether the ruling of the court will work an injustice to either [party] and whether the granting of the motion will unduly delay a trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“representations of counsel are not, legally speaking, evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.