Bird Machine Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 1962
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on 49 Cust. Ct. 65 - Bird Machine Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Planing-machine knives, tannery and leather knives, tobacco knives, paper and pulp mill knives, roll bars, bed plates, and all other stock-treating parts for pulp and paper machinery, * * * meat-slicing cutters, * * per centum ad valorem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Roll bars, bed plates, and all other stock-treating parts for pulp and paper machinery (not including paper or pulp mill knives)- 19% ad val. 18% ad val. 17% ad val.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We agree with the lower court that the screens here involved are not ejusdem generis with the articles designated in said paragraph 356. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.