Marie’s Empirical Analysis
49 F. 286 · 1892
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1942
2 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ross v. McIntyre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The treaty of 1827 is a law of that kingdom, and by it the consuls of that country are given exclusive jurisdiction of all `differences' controversies between the captain and crew of a Norwegian vessel. This, in effect, forbids disables the libelant from resorting to any other tribunal for the settlement of such `difference.' The treaty is also a law of the United States, and forbids this court from interfering in a case of a `difference' between the master and crew of a Norwegian vessel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. The Taigen Maru
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.