Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.1d 333 - Salmon v. Mills

Salmon v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

49 F. 333 · 1892

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 1895
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co. · First National Bank v. Randall · Keith v. Armstrong · Nolen v. Royston · Sherrill v. Bench & Bro.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, that the above-named, defendants are about to remove and have removed their property, or a material pa.rt thereof, out of the Indian Territory, not leaving enough therein to satisfy the plaintiff’s claim or the claim of, defendants’ creditors; second, that they have sold, conveyed, and otherwise disposed of their property, and suffered and permitted it to be sold, with the fraudulent intent to cheat, hinder, and delay their creditors; third, and that they are about to sell, convey, and otherwise dispose of their property with such intent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.