Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.1d 360 - In re McDonough

In re McDonough’s Empirical Analysis

49 F. 360 · 1892

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1911
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1911

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

50189219001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wiltberger · Arthur v. Morrison · State v. . Giersch · State v. Oliver · People v. Crilley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The case must be a strong one, indeed, wbieb would justify a court in departing from the plain meaning of words, especially, in a penal act, in search of an intention which the words themselves did not suggest. To determine that a ease is within the intention of a statute, its language must authorize us to say so. It would he dangerous, indeed, to carry the principle that a case, which is within the reason or mischief of a statute, is within its provisions, so far as to punish a crime not enumerated in the statute, because it is of egual atrocity, or of kindred character, with those which are enumerated.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Tlio Intention of tlie Legislature is to be collected from the words they employ. Where there is no ambiguity in the words, there is no room for construction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.