Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.2d 103 - Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.

Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co.’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.2d 103 · 1931

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 1989
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1989

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60193119401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 396

Relies on Knight v. United Land Ass'n · The United States v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo · United States of America the Riverside Oil Company v. Ethan a Hitchcock · United States v. Noble · Smith v. McCullough

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.