Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.2d 118 - Grant v. United States

Grant v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.2d 118 · 1931

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1959
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United States · Vernon v. United States · Salinger v. United States · Wright v. United States · De Gregorio v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unless there is substantial evidence of facts which exclude every other hypothesis but that of guilt, it is the duty of the trial judge to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the accused, and, where all the evidence is as consistent with innocence as with guilt, it is the duty of the court to reverse a judgment against the accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.