Miller v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.2d 368 · 1931
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1979
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 481
Relies on Manchester v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · The Apollon · Church v. Hubbart · United States v. Sischo · Harrison v. Vose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant contends that the collection district thus defined is limited to the territorial boundaries of the United States, which extend only to the three-mile limit at sea. We think, however, that this ignores the jurisdiction asserted under the revenue statutes to the twelve-mile limit, and that the collection district as contemplated by the statute in question extends to that limit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Mazel Tov
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.