Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.2d 506 - Fall v. United States

Fall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.2d 506 · 1931

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1987 · most notably Michelson v. United States (1948), United States v. Haldeman (1976)

50 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions

300193119401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 207

Relies on Reynolds v. States · Burton v. United States · Thomas Wood Junior v. United States · Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States · Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question was one of fraudulent intent or not; and upon questions of that sort, where the intent of the party is matter in issue, it has always been deemed allowable, as well in criminal as in civil cases, to introduce evidence of other acts and doings of the party, of a kindred character, in order to illustrate or establish his intent or motive in the particular act directly in judgment. Indeed, in no other way would it be practicable, in many cases, to establish such intent or- motive, for the single act, taken by itself, may not be decisive either way; but when taken in connection with others of the like character and nature, the intent and motive may be demonstrated almost with a conclusive certainty.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.