Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.2d 574 - Bennett v. Langworthy

Bennett v. Langworthy’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.2d 574 · 1931

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2004

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hecht v. Malley · Briggs v. Spaulding · Hecht v. Malley · Wheeler v. Greene · Cooper v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “collect all -debts, dues, and claims belonging to it, and, with”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.