Turner v. Kirkwood’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.2d 590 · 1931
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1987
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Union Stock Yards Company of Omaha v. Chicago Burlington Quincy Railroad Company · Antoine Michoud v. Peronne Bernardine Girod · Lovejoy v. Murray · William Oliver and Micajah Williams v. Robert Piatt · Cook v. Tullis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No executor or administrator must directly or indirectly, purchase any property of the estate he represents, nor must he be interested in any sale.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.