Domenech v. Havemeyer’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.2d 849 · 1931
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1957
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 737 · 48 U.S.C. § 741 · 48 U.S.C. § 845
Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad · Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Hertz v. Woodman · Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That in Porto Rico and the Philippine Islands the income tax shall be levied, assessed, collected, and paid in accordance with the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1916 as amended. *;;;***** “The Porto Rican or Philippine Legislature shall have power by due enactment to amend, alter, modify, or repeal the income tax laws in force in Porto Rico or the Philippine Islands, respectively.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rivera v. Buscaglia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.