United States v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.3d 1 · 1995
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Sawyer (1996), Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-Rivera (1997)
41 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is not for witnesses to instruct the jury as to applicable principles of law, but for the judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although we agree that the evidence in the presentence report may not be able to support a finding that [Royal] has the ability to pay restitution in that amount, the statute does not require such a finding; it requires only that the district court consider the defendant's financial resource as a factor in arriving at the figure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In fashioning a restitution order, a court must consider 'the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense, the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.