Millgard Corp. v. McKee/Mays’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.3d 1070 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2016
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Kentucky · Texas v. New Mexico · Coloma Community School District v. Berry · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disclaimers and the language of the project manual show that the parties placed the risk of underground water on [the contractor].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The bargain struck by the parties allocated the risk and there it ends. We enforce the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when two provisions of a contract conflict, the specific trumps the general,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.