United States v. Horry’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.3d 1178 · 1995
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Brewster v. Derwinski · Nicholas v. United States · Joseph v. United States · Baumgart v. Fairchild Aircraft Corp. · United States v. Morrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the obstruction must occur solely with respect to the offense of conviction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“cases where more planning occurs than is typical for commission of the offense in a simple form; cases involving significant steps to conceal; and cases involving repeated acts over a long period of time, unless each instance was purely opportune.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to appeal a conviction based on sufficiency of the evidence, a defendant must move for judgment of acquittal during trial or within seven days after the jury is discharged pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.