Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 1193 - Hannah v. Conley

Hannah v. Conley’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 1193 · 1995

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
June 2014
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably James David Carter v. Ricky Bell, Warden Paul Summers, Attorney General (2000), Clinkscale v. Carter (2004)

23 federal appellate ·

430199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Fay v. Noia · Murray v. Carrier · Rose v. Lundy · Darr v. Burford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`fairly presented' the substance of each of his federal constitutional claims to the state courts. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he prisoner will not be allowed to present claims never before presented in the state courts unless he can show cause to excuse his failure to present the claims in the state courts and actual prejudice to his defense at trial or on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f a prisoner fails to present his claims to the state courts and he is now barred from pursuing relief there, his petition should not be dismissed for lack of exhaustion because there are simply no remedies available for him to exhaust.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.