Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 1324 - Beyerbach v. Sears

Beyerbach v. Sears’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 1324 · 1995

Citation profile

246
cited by 246 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 246 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Dulany v. Carnahan (1997), Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux Center (1997)

47 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1210199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Wilson v. Seiter · Hudson v. McMillian · Hathaway v. Coughlin · Hill v. Dekalb Regional Youth Detention Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 246 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must place verifying medical evidence in the record to establish the detrimental effect of delay in medical treatment...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rule 56. Summary Judgment (b) For Defending Party. A party against whom a claim ... is asserted ... may, at any time, move for a summary judgment in the party’s favor as to all or any part thereof. (c) Motions and Proceedings Thereon.... The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the ‘pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the objective seriousness of the deprivation should also be measured `by reference to the effect of delay in treatment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.